Analysis of weather and ship-type effects on fuel efficiency and emissions for green maritime operations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61435/jese.2025.e58Keywords:
Machine Learning, SHapley Additive exPlanations, Emission, Fuel Efficiency, Green MaritimeAbstract
This research is an endeavour to develop an explainable machine learning framework to quantify the combined effect of ship type, fuel type, distance and weather conditions affecting fuel consumption and CO2 emissions for green maritime operations. The data collected from the voyage-level records for various vessel categories was pre-processed and used to train three supervised regression models: Linear Regression, Random Forest, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). The models were tested based on the coefficient of determination (R2) and mean squared error for training and test data sets separately for fuel consumption and CO2 emission. Results show that all models are able to capture the main trends, but the Random Forest was able to provide the most accurate and robust predictions, with values of test R2 exceeding 0.94 and the lowest values of error for both target variables. In order to improve the interpretability, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis and feature importance measures were used for the Random Forest models. Distance becomes the main factor, whereas ship type, fuel type, and weather variables have a secondary but significant impact on fuel consumption and emissions. The proposed approach offers a transparent and computationally efficient aid for supporting operational optimization, fuel choice evaluation, and policy design in the context of maritime decarbonization.
References
IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships. (n.d.). Retrieved November 29, 2025, from https://www.imo.org/en/ourwork/environment/pages/2023-imo-strategy-on-reduction-of-ghg-emissions-from-ships.aspx
Abaei, M. M., Hekkenberg, R., BahooToroody, A., Banda, O. V., & van Gelder, P. (2022). A probabilistic model to evaluate the resilience of unattended machinery plants in autonomous ships. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 219, 108176. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESS.2021.108176
Agarwala, N. (2021). Managing marine environmental pollution using Artificial Intelligence. Maritime Technology and Research, 3(2), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.33175/MTR.2021.248053
Akbar, B., Tayara, H., & Chong, K. T. (2024). Unveiling dominant recombination loss in perovskite solar cells with a XGBoost-based machine learning approach. IScience, 27(3), 109200. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ISCI.2024.109200
Ampah, J. D., Yusuf, A. A., Afrane, S., Jin, C., & Liu, H. (2021). Reviewing two decades of cleaner alternative marine fuels: Towards IMO’s decarbonization of the maritime transport sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 320, 128871. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.128871
Fan, A., Yang, J., Yang, L., Wu, D., & Vladimir, N. (2022). A review of ship fuel consumption models. Ocean Engineering, 264, 112405. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OCEANENG.2022.112405
Fryer, D., Strümke, I., & Nguyen, H. (2021). Shapley Values for Feature Selection: The Good, the Bad, and the Axioms. IEEE Access, 9, 144352–144360. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3119110
Fuel efficiency and CO2 emission data sources - International Council on Clean Transportation. (n.d.). Retrieved November 29, 2025, from https://theicct.org/tools-fuel-efficiency-co2-data/?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=22639629046&gclid=CjwKCAiAraXJBhBJEiwAjz7MZa8sGbFmWppu7Q742mjvssnulHIgqy73mtrFbaFyTNap_8H5HVn0wxoCYF0QAvD_BwE
Gabaldón, A., Carmen Ruiz-Abellón, M., Alfredo Fernández-Jiménez, L., Bae, D.-J., Kwon, B.-S., & Song, K.-B. (2021). XGBoost-Based Day-Ahead Load Forecasting Algorithm Considering Behind-the-Meter Solar PV Generation. Energies 2022, Vol. 15, Page 128, 15(1), 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/EN15010128
Garcia, B., Foerster, A., & Lin, J. (2021). Net Zero for the International Shipping Sector? An Analysis of the Implementation and Regulatory Challenges of the IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG Emissions. Journal of Environmental Law, 33(1), 85–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/JEL/EQAA014
Gholizadeh, M., Jamei, M., Ahmadianfar, I., & Pourrajab, R. (2020). Prediction of nanofluids viscosity using random forest (RF) approach. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 201, 104010. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHEMOLAB.2020.104010
Guo, B., Liang, Q., Tvete, H. A., Brinks, H., & Vanem, E. (2022). Combined machine learning and physics-based models for estimating fuel consumption of cargo ships. Ocean Engineering, 255, 111435. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OCEANENG.2022.111435
Gupta, P., Rasheed, A., & Steen, S. (2022). Ship performance monitoring using machine-learning. Ocean Engineering, 254, 111094. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OCEANENG.2022.111094
Hu, Z., Jin, Y., Hu, Q., Sen, S., Zhou, T., & Osman, M. T. (2019). Prediction of fuel consumption for enroute ship based on machine learning. IEEE Access, 7, 119497–119505. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2933630
IMO. (2021). Fourth IMO GHG Study 2020 Full Report. International Maritime Organisation, 6(11).
Kumar K, P., Alruqi, M., Hanafi, H. A., Sharma, P., & Wanatasanappan, V. V. (2024). Effect of particle size on second law of thermodynamics analysis of Al2O3 nanofluid: Application of XGBoost and gradient boosting regression for prognostic analysis. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 197, 108825. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJTHERMALSCI.2023.108825
Le, T. T., Nguyen, H. P., Rudzki, K., Rowiński, L., Bui, V. D., Truong, T. H., Le, H. C., & Pham, N. D. K. (2023). Management Strategy for Seaports Aspiring to Green Logistical Goals of IMO: Technology and Policy Solutions. Polish Maritime Research, 30(2), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.2478/POMR-2023-0031
Liu, Y. xiao, Dong, Y. wu, Jiang, Z. hua, Li, Y. shuo, Zha, W., Du, Y. xin, & Du, S. yang. (2023). XGBoost-based model for predicting hydrogen content in electroslag remelting. Journal of Iron and Steel Research International 2023 30:5, 30(5), 887–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/S42243-023-00962-0
Ma, Y., Zhao, Y., Yu, J., Zhou, J., & Kuang, H. (2023). An Interpretable Gray Box Model for Ship Fuel Consumption Prediction Based on the SHAP Framework. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 2023, Vol. 11, Page 1059, 11(5), 1059. https://doi.org/10.3390/JMSE11051059
Majidi Nezhad, M., Neshat, M., Sylaios, G., & Astiaso Garcia, D. (2024). Marine energy digitalization digital twin’s approaches. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 191, 114065. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2023.114065
Maulud, D., Maulud, D., & Abdulazeez, A. M. (2020). A Review on Linear Regression Comprehensive in Machine Learning. Journal of Applied Science and Technology Trends, 1(2), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.38094/jastt1457
Mokhtari, K. El, Higdon, B. P., & Başar, A. (2019). Interpreting financial time series with SHAP values. Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, 166–172.
Nguyen, H. P., Nguyen, C. T. U., Tran, T. M., Dang, Q. H., & Pham, N. D. K. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Green Shipping: Navigating towards Sustainable Maritime Practices. JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization, 8(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.62527/JOIV.8.1.2581
Nguyen, V. G., Rajamohan, S., Rudzki, K., Kozak, J., Sharma, P., Pham, N. D. K., Nguyen, P. Q. P., & Xuan, P. N. (2023). Using Artificial Neural Networks for Predicting Ship Fuel Consumption. Polish Maritime Research, 30(2), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.2478/POMR-2023-0020
Patil, D., Kumar, S., & Somasekar, J. (2024). Assessment of Machine Learning Procedures for Forecasting Ship Fuel Ingestion. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 5(1), 1059–1064. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.5.0124.0202
Qiu, Y., Zhou, J., Khandelwal, M., Yang, H., Yang, P., & Li, C. (2021). Performance evaluation of hybrid WOA-XGBoost, GWO-XGBoost and BO-XGBoost models to predict blast-induced ground vibration. Engineering with Computers 2021 38:5, 38(5), 4145–4162. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00366-021-01393-9
Rudzki, K., Gomulka, P., & Hoang, A. T. (2022). Optimization Model to Manage Ship Fuel Consumption and Navigation Time. Polish Maritime Research, 29(3), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.2478/POMR-2022-0034
Sharma, P., & Sharma, A. K. (2021). AI-Based Prognostic Modeling and Performance Optimization of CI Engine Using Biodiesel-Diesel Blends. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research, 11(2), 701–708. https://doi.org/10.20508/IJRER.V11I2.11854.G8191
Sui, C., de Vos, P., Stapersma, D., Visser, K., & Ding, Y. (2020). Fuel Consumption and Emissions of Ocean-Going Cargo Ship with Hybrid Propulsion and Different Fuels over Voyage. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 2020, Vol. 8, Page 588, 8(8), 588. https://doi.org/10.3390/JMSE8080588
Talekar, B., & Agrawal, S. (2020). A detailed review on decision tree and random forest. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Commun, 13(14), 245–248.
Uyanik, T., Arslanoglu, Y., & Kalenderli, O. (2019). Ship fuel consumption prediction with machine learning. Proceedings of the 4th International Mediterranean Science and Engineering Congress, Antalya, Turkey, 25–27.
Uyanık, T., Karatuğ, Ç., & Arslanoğlu, Y. (2020). Machine learning approach to ship fuel consumption: A case of container vessel. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 84, 102389. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRD.2020.102389
Villegas-Mier, C. G., Rodriguez-Resendiz, J., Álvarez-Alvarado, J. M., Jiménez-Hernández, H., & Odry, Á. (2022). Optimized Random Forest for Solar Radiation Prediction Using Sunshine Hours. Micromachines 2022, Vol. 13, Page 1406, 13(9), 1406. https://doi.org/10.3390/MI13091406
Wang, Y. A., Huang, Q., Yao, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2024). On a class of linear regression methods. Journal of Complexity, 82, 101826. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCO.2024.101826
Wojtuch, A., Jankowski, R., & Podlewska, S. (2021). How can SHAP values help to shape metabolic stability of chemical compounds? Journal of Cheminformatics 2021 13:1, 13(1), 74-. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13321-021-00542-Y
Wu, P. C., & Lin, C. Y. (2020). Cost-Benefit Evaluation on Promising Strategies in Compliance with Low Sulfur Policy of IMO. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 2021, Vol. 9, Page 3, 9(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/JMSE9010003
Wu, Z., Wang, S., Li, L., & Suo, Y. (2025). An interpretable ship risk model based on machine learning and SHAP interpretation technique. Ocean Engineering, 335, 121686. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OCEANENG.2025.121686
Zannis, T. C., Katsanis, J. S., Christopoulos, G. P., Yfantis, E. A., Papagiannakis, R. G., Pariotis, E. G., Rakopoulos, D. C., Rakopoulos, C. D., & Vallis, A. G. (2022). Marine Exhaust Gas Treatment Systems for Compliance with the IMO 2020 Global Sulfur Cap and Tier III NOx Limits: A Review. Energies 2022, Vol. 15, Page 3638, 15(10), 3638. https://doi.org/10.3390/EN15103638
Zhang, L., Qiu, Y. F., Chen, Y., & Hoang, A. T. (2023). Multi-objective particle swarm optimization applied to a solar-geothermal system for electricity and hydrogen production; Utilization of zeotropic mixtures for performance improvement. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 175, 814–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSEP.2023.05.082
Downloads
Submitted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ngoc Doanh Le, Nguyen Dang Khoa Pham
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Journal of Emerging Science and Engineering published under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License / CC BY 4.0 This license permits anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivative works of this material for any purpose, including commercial purposes, so long as they include credit to the Authors of the original work.
